On-chain · agentic finance

Is it safe to act?

Money2046 is the data layer for agentic finance. The observatory measures what it costs to move money. This section measures the on-chain conditions an agent has to know before it routes, holds, or settles. Each card is the published reading, drawn beside the number. The feed keeps the full object. Books for Aerodrome, Zcash, and NEAR ask whether that fundamental is still expanding.

Feed /data/v1/onchain/index.json · as of 2026-10-09T16:16:40.000Z · contract below · design docs/onchain.md

BNB Chain · flagship · ratio · OK

low

BSC DEX wash share

67.33%

PancakeSwap WBNB–USDT · 1,200 blocks

Combined 67.33%

PancakeSwap v2 WBNB–USDT 93.14%

PancakeSwap v3 WBNB–USDT 63.76%

The solid tick is this window. A dashed tick, when present, is the previous stored window. The mark is the band from low to high, on a 0–100% scale. Pools stay in published order.

Band 67.33%–67.33%. Unflagged 32.67%–32.67%. Previous window 67.98% as of 2026-10-09T07:26:50.000Z.

What share of reported BSC DEX volume is wash or MEV, and what is the wash-adjusted band?

Is this venue's liquidity real enough to route through? · confidence low · as of 2026-10-09T16:16:40.000Z

Ethereum · risk · OK

low

Aave liquidation cascades

0.00%

Share of calls sitting in a multi-call cluster

In a cluster 0.00%

Window 26086595–26134594. Gap 25 blocks. Squares count the longest run (1). Call positions are not in the reading.

Longest cluster is 1 call.

How do liquidation cascades propagate, and how deep do they run?

What a cascade does to a position and to the ability to execute. · confidence low · as of 2026-10-06T16:41:47.000Z

Base · quality · OK

medium

Aerodrome incentive efficiency

4.9842×

Median emissions per fee-yield

Below 1× 28.88%
1× to 5× 21.29%
5× or more 49.81%

0.8355× p25

4.9842× median

33.4169× p75

No fee yield 34.18%

2025-11 3.5782× 2026-10 3.1346×

Bands are shares of pools that have a fee yield, split at 1× and 5×. The median sits in 1× to 5×. The no-fee bar is the share of reward-paying pools with no fee yield.

Below 1× 28.88% · 1× to 5× 21.29% · 5× or more 49.81%.

Where do AERO emissions actually buy sticky liquidity versus mercenary liquidity?

Is the depth real or rented? · confidence medium · as of 2026-10-06T16:41:52.390Z

Base · quality · OK

low

Aerodrome emission mix

6.4046×

Volatile emissions per fee, relative to stable pools

0.8775× Stable

4.3729× Routed

5.6201× Volatile

Each figure is that class's median emissions per fee-yield. The headline is volatile divided by stable. Shares of fee-yielding pools: stable 5.77%, routed 46.20%, volatile 48.01%. Classes are pair shape, not size.

Stable 0.8775× · routed 4.3729× · volatile 5.6201×.

Do AERO emissions pay more per fee on volatile pools than on stable pools?

Whether the liquidity an agent would route through is the liquidity emissions are renting. · confidence low · as of 2026-10-06T16:41:52.390Z

Arbitrum · calendar · OK

low

ARB unlock calendar

2026-10-16

Next monthly unlock (UTC date)

Next · 2026-10-16

2026-11-16

2026-12-16

team
investor

Bar length compares classes inside this calendar. Printed figures are the share of initial supply. Foundation cadence: per_second. That clock is not on these dates.

Observed movement after unlock is not attributed.

When is the next unlock, and where does it go?

Dilution risk to its book. · confidence low · as of 2026-10-06T16:41:51.957Z

NEAR · ratio · OK

low

NEAR intents flow composition

53.20%

intents.near · 2026-09-30 · 7 min

AURORA aaaaaa….factory.bridge.near 0.00%

BLACKDRAGON blackdragon.tkn.near 100.00%

ETH base.omft.near 46.05%

ETH eth.omft.near 90.00%

LTC ltc.omft.near 53.20%

SOL sol.omft.near 34.21%

SWEAT base.omft.near 0.00%

SWEAT token.sweat 99.00%

USDC arb.omft.near 77.17%

USDC eth.omft.near 8.98%

USDC sol.omft.near 1.61%

USDT eth.omft.near 65.07%

USDT tron.omft.near 99.99%

wNEAR wrap.near 97.65%

ZEC zec.omft.near 29.95%

Alphabetical, as published, not ordered by share. Each bar is that contract's inflow share. The dashed line is the equal-weight median, 53.20%. 0% and 100% are entirely one way. Short names keep the chain. The reading lists the full contract.

Contracts whose flow is entirely one way 20.00%.

How does value move into and out of NEAR?

How money moves between chains for settlement. · confidence low · as of 2026-09-30T00:32:45.000Z

NEAR · ratio · OK

low

NEAR stable versus other flow

15.45%

Stable median inflow minus other assets

Stable 65.07%

Other 49.62%

2025-11 -0.5854 2026-09 -0.1721

Equal-weight median inflow share. 100% is entirely into intents.near. The headline is stable minus other. The line, when present, is that gap by month.

Stable 65.07% · other 49.62%.

Do stablecoin intents and other assets move the same way through intents.near?

Whether a stable settlement and a volatile settlement are on the same side of the rail. · confidence low · as of 2026-09-30T00:32:45.000Z

Zcash · ratio · OK

low

Zcash shielded activity

1.75%

Shielded share of sampled activity

This window 1.75%

Prior window 1.35%

2025-11 0.0000 2026-10 0.0000

Both marks use the full 0–100% scale. The line, when present, is one page near the start of each month. Blocks 3508441–3508521, prior 3474091–3474171. Activity, not pool stock.

Prior window 1.35%. Trend 0.39%.

What share of ZEC activity is shielded?

Counterparty and settlement privacy. · confidence low · as of 2026-10-06T16:42:01.556Z

Zcash · ratio · OK

low

Zcash shield direction

0.18%

Net share of transactions adding value to the shielded pool

Into the pool 1.32%

Out of the pool 1.13%

Share of non-coinbase transactions. The headline is into the pool minus out of the pool. Prior net 0.89%. Blocks 3509937–3510537.

Into the pool 1.32%. Out of the pool 1.13%. Prior net 0.89%.

Are ZEC transactions adding value to the shielded pool or taking it out?

Whether privacy demand is shielding new value or spending it back out. · confidence low · as of 2026-10-08T10:50:02.000Z

Metric contract

Every analysis publishes this object. OK is a reading, not a VERIFIED_FRESH settlement. Shares are decimal strings so a rebuild cannot drift. A missing input is INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE.

{
  slug, question, why_agent,
  metric_kind: "ratio" | "risk" | "quality" | "calendar",
  value, unit, as_of,
  sources: [ { name, url } ],
  method_url, confidence, limitations: [],
  status: "OK" | "INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE"
}

Banned keys, including nested ones: volume, TVL, dominance, rank, leaderboard, market cap, top-N, and the payment-count stems already refused on the settlement feeds. The check is src/lib/onchain-guard.js. It walks every subtree. census-guard.js is unchanged.

Disclosure: Money2046 publishes receipts for agent payments: fee, time, fail, facilitator, chain — or INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE. Not financial advice. Evidence can be insufficient. We charge you in USD. Payment processing by Airwallex. Money2046 does not move customer funds and is not a wallet, an exchange, or a payment processor.